The Ven. Douglas Dettmer
Exeter
House of Clergy
DOUGLAS DETTMER
Archdeacon of Totnes
Blue Hills, Bovey Tracey, Newton Abbot, TQ13 9EU
Tel. (01626) 832064
Proposer
Jane Bakker
Seconder
Andrew Beane
I have served on General Synod as one of your Proctors in Convocation since 2012 and am
standing for re-election because I have been encouraged by many others to do so, and equally
because I feel a genuine sense of vocation to continue representing clergy colleagues in this
way while offering back the experience of synodical work built up over the years. To that
end, I will be grateful for your first-preference or high-preference vote in the election.
The General Synod is the only forum outside Parliament which can make the law of the land,
and indeed its primary function is to shape ecclesiastical legislation. As in Parliament, much of
the legislative work of General Synod is behind the scenes. Over the years I have developed
a close familiarity with the Synod’s ways of operating and have sought to apply that expertise
both in the day-to-day work of legislating for mission nationally and by channelling it back
locally, to support mission and ministry here in our own diocese.
For the past several years I have served on the central Legislative Reform Committee, which
oversees the progress of church legislation through the Synod on behalf of the Archbishops’
Council. As a member of the Legal Advisory Commission, I help with the shaping of advice to
clarify practical questions of ecclesiastical law as the need arises.
In the last quinquennium I was invited to become one of the Synod’s panel of chairs and have
been glad to serve in this way. The trust of the Synod in the integrity and impartiality of the
chairing is of paramount importance to me, and I have been grateful for the confidence of
members across the range of considered views expressed in debate.
I am a longstanding member of the Rural Interest Group on General Synod and its predecessor
the Rural Affairs Group of the Mission & Public Affairs Council, whose role has included keeping
rural issues in the foreground of the church’s thinking and engaging with government and other
bodies on rural and agricultural policy.
In both rural and urban areas, a ‘mixed ecology’ is essential for the whole church’s effectiveness
in mission in our generation. Having been a multi-parish rural incumbent in this diocese for
seventeen years, and for the past eleven and a half one of the archdeacons supporting clergy and
lay people in rural and urban parishes, I remain utterly committed to the parish system as the
bedrock of the Church of England’s proclamation of the Gospel in our localities, and to our own
Exeter diocesan vision for the growth of mission communities encompassing churches,
chaplaincies, schools, and new worshipping communities of many different kinds—with the
parish church at the heart of it all.
continued over the page
A continuing priority for me is the need for the General Synod to strengthen its engagement
with the Church Commissioners, in the expectation that a greater proportion of their
investment income will be used to support ‘cure of souls’ parochial ministry in dioceses
including our own. I strongly support the development of a greater formal role for the Synod
in shaping the national Funding Framework to that end.
I have served the whole thirty-six years of my ordained ministry in this diocese. As a parish
priest in mid Devon I was elected chair of our diocesan House of Clergy and for many years
served as a rural dean and archdeaconry warden of Readers. In those capacities and as one
of your archdeacons I have had the privilege of getting to know our large, diverse diocese and
its clergy well. If re-elected, I would continue to bring to the General Synod not the views
of any one party or group but rather the perspective of the diocese as a whole,
especially its priests and deacons.
Of all the decisions taken by the General Synod over the past decade and a half, the most
consequential was approval of the legislation enabling women to be ordained as bishops. I
strongly advocated and voted for that legislation; at the same time, both in the Synod and in
the diocese I have worked to ensure provision for those who for conscientious theological
reasons are not able to accept that development, so that they and their ministries can continue
to flourish within the Church of England. I so much value the fact that people with differing
perspectives have felt able to consider me their representative over the years.
The outcome of the process leading to women in the episcopate and its foundational principles
for our life together as a church—based on trust, mutuality, and respect for conscientious
difference—are of equal significance for the work around the Living in Love and Faith process
which ended in that particular form at the close of the last quinquennium, but of course will
remain an ongoing an ongoing matter for discernment and debate in the next. My own past
voting record has been on the progressive side of these questions, though since being asked
to chair LLF-related debates in the Synod I have refrained from voting in them as a visible
expression of the impartiality of the chairing. As a member of the national LLF working groups
for part of their existence, I made it my priority above all to advocate for the whole range of
conscientious views in this area to be honoured and provided for practically.
In the next stage of synodical work around teaching and practice in this and other areas, I
believe the Church of England needs to walk a path which enables faithful Christians who differ
in their theological and practical interpretation of scripture to stay alongside each other in
good conscience. From the Elizabethan Settlement onward, history shows that the ability to
do so has been one of the strengths of the Church of England, and I believe that by God’s
grace it can continue to be. I value the historic comprehensiveness and tolerance of the Anglican
‘middle way’, which when founded on deep theological integrity and spiritual authenticity are
among the distinctive gifts which further our church’s mission in the society we serve.
In my own ministry as a parish priest and archdeacon in this diocese, time and again I have
witnessed mutual love and respect for one another across differences lived out in practice in
the life of our mission communities, and I believe that with prayer and openness to God, what
is possible locally is likewise possible across a diocese and nationally.
Please don’t hesitate to be in touch by email, letter or phone if you would like to talk about
any of this, and in any case I look forward to responding to any questions submitted through
the online Q&A forum as part of the election process. With my thanks and best wishes,
agricultural,archbishops,archbishops' council,church commissioners,dioceses,discernment,ecology,gospel,living in love and faith,llf,mission,new worshipping communities,prayer,progressive,scripture,the society
progressive,the society
living in love and faith,llf
gospel,mission,new worshipping communities
discernment,prayer,scripture
agricultural,ecology
archbishops,archbishops' council,church commissioners,dioceses
